Commercial Breeder Bill SB460 hearing 4/30
April 29, 2009
NORTH CAROLINA ACTION ALERT
SB 460 Commercial Dog Breeders introduced by Senator Don Davis (D, Wayne/Pitt/Greene) is scheduled to be heard in the Commerce Committee on Thursday, April 30 at 9:00 AM, room 1027 LB
BILL SYNOPSIS
SB 460 defines as commercial anyone who has custody or control of more than 15 female dogs over the age of four months at any time. The bill establishes standards for care at commercial breeding operations, including requirements which will be written by the NC Department of Agriculture at a later date, for exercise, veterinary care and record keeping. The bill mandates that commercial breeders cannot breed female dogs less than 18 months or more than eight years of age. SB 460 mandates that an adult female dog cannot be bred without an annual certification from a licensed veterinarian that the dog is in suitable health for breeding.
** TALKING POINTS **
* The bills define as commercial anyone maintaining 15 females during the span of 12 months – does not say intact females, does not define what age is considered adult.
* Thousands of North Carolina citizens breed dogs without creating problems and they do not require state inspections. This is reactive legislation to the recent closure of a substandard kennel. The kennel closure and removal of dogs is evidence that current law adequately dealt with the situation.
* The potential exists for warrantless searches of a citizen’s home and kennel while inspecting dogs to determine if license is required.
* SB 460 assumes that an owner of 15 or more dogs is not capable of managing and maintaining their animals in good health without state intervention. It is wrong to use a numerical basis to begin excessive regulation of dog breeders; numbers do not correlate to quality of care. Laws for animal welfare and to prevent animal-cruelty are already in place to protect all animals whether it is one dog or one hundred.
* The requirement for annual veterinary certification of suitable health for breeding is very vague. Certification could require anything from routine physical exam to an expensive panel of blood tests and x-rays. There are no standardized, specific laboratory tests or specialized reproductive examination procedures that are suitable for assessing the health status of bitches for breeding. No other species has this pre-breeding regulation in place. This provision only serves to make breeding dogs more expensive and more complicated. The decision to breed or not breed a dog should remain at the discretion of the owner and not become a legislative mandate.
* Bill supporters claim that small hobby breeders will not be affected. This is not true. Supporters claim the only reason to have 15 females is for mass producing puppies, i.e. continually breeding each female. Also not true. The bill supporters are activists, NOT dog breeders and have no firsthand knowledge of building or maintaining a breeding program. It is quite possible for someone to have 15 females without constantly producing puppies.
* Promoted with the usual anti-puppy mill hype and emotion, the bill focuses on labeling dog breeders, i.e., commercial=puppy mill to justify this over-the-top legislation. The term puppy mill has been promoted by animal rights activists in the same manner as a racial slur to cast a negative picture on the whole industry of breeding dogs; the goal is to eventually make all the words interchangeable, commercial=puppy mill=breeder.
* The cost to dog owners/breeders for construction of commercial grade facilities to meet state requirements will be enormous. It is irresponsible for legislators to force this expense on citizens who are already financially stressed in the current recession.
* There is no hard evidence that substandard kennel conditions are rampant throughout the state. It is pure conjecture for anyone to discuss whether dogs are housed in adequate or substandard conditions. The North Carolina Department of Agriculture estimates 79 kennels are likely to have 15 females; however, this does not automatically correlate to those kennels being substandard and/or in need of state intervention and regulation.
* The Fiscal Note on SB 460 has been provided by the Fiscal Research Division with input from NC DACS. The Department’s Animal Welfare Section estimates costs to implement a regulatory
program are a staggering quarter of a million dollars for this year and increase to almost a half million dollars going forward with virtually no income. With a state budget shortfall in excess of three billion dollars and government programs being cut, it is the height of irresponsibility to burden NCDA with this initiative.
ACTION IS NEEDED NOW! PLEASE CALL AND EMAIL SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE AND OPPOSE SB 460:
Sen. R.C. Soles, Jr. (Chair)
Phone: (919) 733-5963
RC.Soles@ncleg.net
Sen. Floyd McKissick, Jr. (Vice Chair)
Phone: (919) 733-4599
Floyd.McKissick@ncleg.net
Sen. David Hoyle (Vice Chair)
Phone: (919) 733-5734
David.Hoyle@ncleg.net
Sen. Tony Rand (Vice Chair)
Phone: (919) 733-9892
Tony.Rand@ncleg.net
Sen. Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
Sen. Philip Berger
Phone: (919) 733-5708
Phil.Berger@ncleg.net
Sen. Doug Berger
Phone: (919) 715-8683
Doug.Berger@ncleg.net
Sen. Harris Blake
Phone: (919) 733-4809
Harris.Blake@ncleg.net
Sen. Julia Boseman
Phone: (919) 715-2525
Julia.Boseman@ncleg.net
Sen. Peter Brunstetter
Phone: (919) 733-7850
Peter.Brunstetter@ncleg.net
Sen. Debbie Clary
Phone: (919) 715-3038
Debbie.Clary@ncleg.net
Sen. Katie Dorsett
Phone: (919)715-3042
Katie.Dorsett@ncleg.net
Sen. Tony Foriest
Phone: (919) 301-1446
Tony.Foriest@ncleg.net
Sen. James Forrester
Phone: (919) 715-3050
James.Forrester@ncleg.net
Sen. Linda Garrou
Phone: (919) 733-5620
Linda.Garrou@ncleg.net
Sen. W. Edward Goodall
Phone: (919) 733-7659
Eddie.Goodall@ncleg.net
Sen. Steve Goss
Phone: (919) 733-5742
Steve.Goss@ncleg.net
Sen. Malcolm Graham
Phone: (919) 733-5650
Malcolm.Graham@ncleg.net
Sen. Neal Hunt
Phone: (919) 733-5850
Neal.Hunt@ncleg.net
Sen. Jim Jacumin
Phone: (919) 715-7823
Jim.Jacumin@ncleg.net
Sen. Clark Jenkins
Phone: (919) 715-3040
Clark.Jenkins@ncleg.net
Sen. Martin Nesbitt, Jr.
Phone: (919) 715-3001
Martin.Nesbitt@ncleg.net
Sen. William Purcell
Phone: (919) 733-5953
William.Purcell@ncleg.net
Sen. Bob Rucho
Phone: (919) 733-5655
Bob.Rucho@ncleg.net
Sen. Larry Shaw
Phone: (919) 733-9349
Larry.Shaw@ncleg.net
Sen. Josh Stein
Phone: (919)715-6400
Josh.Stein@ncleg.net
Sen. Richard Stevens
Phone: (919) 733-5653
Richard.Stevens@ncleg.net
Sen. Don Vaughan
Phone: (919)733-5856
Don.Vaughan@ncleg.net
Additional talking points and contact information are available on the SAOVA website
http://www.saova.org/northcarolina2.html and North Carolina Responsible Animal Owners Alliance [NCRAOA] http://www.ncraoa.com/alertsSB460.html



After a little internet searching, reading, and checking up on this stuff I found it�s a pretty well established product in Canada and hails from Quebec where they have this funny habit of speaking a lot of French. Thus the name, Jig-A-Loo, and the company�s claim it derives from a saying they have up north, �I�ve got it!� 
Comments
Got something to say?